home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT1326>
- <link 93TG0019>
- <title>
- May 22, 1989: Fishing For Leadership
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Endangered Earth Updates
- May 22, 1989 Politics, Panama-Style
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ENVIRONMENT, Page 91
- Fishing for Leadership
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Bush draws criticism for his slow responses to the global
- warming problem, the oil spill and other ecological threats
- </p>
- <p>By Dick Thompson
- </p>
- <p> "I am an environmentalist," proclaimed President Bush
- during his campaign for the White House. Citing his love of the
- great outdoors and the pleasure he takes in hunting and fishing,
- the candidate made it clear that protecting the environment and
- wildlife from the ravages of pollution would be one of his top
- priorities. That stance raised great expectations among
- environmentalists, who had been suffering for eight years while
- President Reagan's neglect of conservation issues allowed many
- problems, from acid rain to toxic waste, to fester dangerously.
- But just four months into the Bush Administration, impatient
- nature lovers have begun to doubt the strength of the
- President's commitment to cleaning up the environment. Several
- signals, including Bush's slow response to the Alaska oil spill
- and his refusal even to consider an increase in the gasoline
- tax, have raised concern that he is not the kind of forceful,
- decisive leader the country needs to deal with the growing
- environmental crisis.
- </p>
- <p> That fear intensified last week as the Administration
- appeared to be in a muddle over one of the most pressing
- ecological issues: global warming. James Hansen, a top scientist
- in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, was all
- set to brief a congressional committee on how the buildup of
- carbon dioxide and other gases in the atmosphere could create
- a greenhouse effect and produce severe climate changes. Hansen
- believes this greenhouse warming may have already started.
- </p>
- <p> Before Hansen could deliver his testimony, however, his
- text was amended by officials at the Office of Management and
- Budget, who routinely review statements made to Congress by
- members of the Administration. OMB staffers inserted a
- disclaimer stating that scientific projections of the impact of
- global warming were merely "estimates" and "not reliable
- predictions." To Hansen, the effect of the change was to water
- down his testimony. When he appeared before a Senate
- subcommittee, he handed out the OMB-revised written testimony,
- but then gave his own uncensored views of the dangers of global
- warming.
- </p>
- <p> The OMB's action raised concern that the White House is not
- serious about dealing with the greenhouse threat. And the
- pressure on Bush increased when Britain called for rapid
- drafting of an international treaty to address global warming.
- Finally on Thursday, even as the President was busy reacting to
- the crisis in Panama, the White House sent a special cable to
- the U.S. delegation attending a U.N.-sponsored environment
- meeting in Geneva. The cable, signed by chief of staff John
- Sununu, directed the American representatives to invite the
- other participating nations to a global-warming workshop in
- Washington this fall. Said Sununu in the message: "The scope and
- importance of this issue are so great that it is essential for
- the U.S. to exercise a leadership role."
- </p>
- <p> But the U.S. appeared to be playing catch-up, just as it
- did on ozone depletion. It was the European Community that
- first proposed a total ban on production of CFCs, the chemicals
- that are believed to be destroying the life-preserving layer of
- ozone in the atmosphere. The U.S., which had been preparing a
- similar proposal, agreed to join the ban. But the timing of the
- announcement made Bush look like a follower, rather than a
- leader, on the ozone question.
- </p>
- <p> By the same token, the President's response to the Alaska
- oil spill tarnished his leadership credentials. Bush failed to
- grasp the symbolic importance of dealing personally with a
- major environmental disaster. When an Exxon tanker dumped 11
- million gal. of oil into Prince William Sound, Bush remained in
- Washington instead of touring the scene of the accident. Even
- his old friend John Chafee, the ranking Republican on the Senate
- Environment and Public Works Committee, says, "That was
- unfortunate, a missed opportunity." Despite the lack of personal
- involvement, however, Bush has sent ships and personnel from the
- Navy, Army, Air Force and Coast Guard to help in the cleanup
- operation.
- </p>
- <p> For all their qualms, environmentalists concede that Bush
- has taken several commendable steps. Among them: proposing new
- regulations on medical-waste disposal, requesting stiffer
- penalties for ocean dumpers, calling for a moratorium on
- offshore oil drilling in Florida and California, and helping
- persuade Japan not to finance construction of a Brazilian road
- that would encourage continued deforestation of the Amazon
- region.
- </p>
- <p> But all these actions were relatively noncontroversial and
- had no significant impact on the economy. To deal effectively
- with tougher issues like global warming, Bush will need to push
- for measures that require sacrifice and stir protest. Almost
- everyone agrees, for example, that the easiest way to cut
- carbon-dioxide emissions would be to reduce wasteful consumption
- of gasoline in the U.S. The Administration is expected to
- announce soon that by 1991 automakers will be required to raise
- the average fuel efficiency of their fleets to 27.5 m.p.g., up
- from 26.5 m.p.g. this year. That is a step in the right
- direction, but an extremely timid one. The Government should be
- setting much higher goals. An even quicker way to curb fuel
- consumption would be to boost the gasoline tax, but Bush seems
- to be locked into his "Read my lips" campaign pledge to avoid
- new taxes.
- </p>
- <p> The next important test will be the Administration's
- position on proposed revisions of the Clean Air Act, which the
- White House has promised to announce by the end of this month.
- Environmentalists want Bush to back, among other things,
- tough new limits on smokestack emissions of sulfur dioxide, a
- major cause of acid rain. But that could cause a political
- backlash in states that produce high-sulfur coal, such as
- Illinois and Pennsylvania. "It's decision-making time for George
- Bush," says John Adams, head of the Natural Resources Defense
- Council. "Unless he acts credibly, his environmental image is
- in danger of unraveling."
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-